I was out of town the entire past week on business, which on one hand is bad because I had to be away from my wife the whole week, but is great on the other hand because the flights give me uninterrupted time to read. For some reason, I can really focus on a plane.Anyway, I had the chance to read Why We're Not Emergent (By Two Guys Who Should Be) this week. I had heard great things about this book, and they are all justified. This is one of the better books I have read in quite a while.
It's written by Kevin DeYoung, a young pastor in East Lansing, and Ted Kluck, a writer who deals mostly in sports and has written books about Mike Tyson and football. An interesting mix. Kevin would write one chapter full of analysis and propositions, then Ted would write one about his experiences engaging different aspects of the Emergent Church. I liked the dynamic, although I thought Kevin's chapters were the real meat of the book. Ted's chapters, with his keen observations, served as a great breather every other chapter.
The book does a great job of presenting what the Emergent Church is all about (although they quickly point out that it is not a unified movement). They focus on the leading voices, combing through sermons, books, blogs, etc. in search of what their beliefs and attitudes are. The result is a great presentation of some of the "Conversation" happening in the movement, and then a biblical analysis of why that particular part of the conversation is dangerous.
I'm not a professional reviewer or theologian, but I thought this book was one of the best defenses of the biblical gospel and associated doctrines I've ever read. Kevin's chapters are articulate, fair to the Emergent movement by not characiturizing the beliefs, and lucid in the defense of the biblical doctrines. Although the book does a lot to show what the Emergent Church is doing, it really becomes a presentation of the Gospel. After all, if we know the true, biblical, gospel it doesn't matter what the "new" beliefs are...we still test them against the Bible. Whether you're interested in the Emergent Church or not, you will find value in this book.
Some of my favorite quote from the book (believe me, there are MANY more I could include...my book is highlighted like crazy):
"It's one thing for a high school student to be in process with his theology. It's another thing for adults to write books and speak around the world about their musings and misgivings...I seriously question that this space should be hugely public where hundreds and thousands of men and women are eagerly awaiting the next book or blog or podcast arising from your faith journey." (p. 17)
The "Are You Emergent" section on pages 20-22 is hysterical.
Commenting on the postmodern ethos: "...it's really cool to search for God. It's not very cool to find Him." (p. 32)
"...my generation is introspective at a level somewhere between self-absorption and narcissism." (p. 34)
"But there is also the possibility of certainty, no because we have dissected God like a freshman biology student dissects a frog, but because God has spoken to us clearly and intelligibly and has given us ears to hear His voice." (p. 40)
"It seems that when emergent authors want to contest traditional beliefs (in, say, hell, exclusivism, and propitiation) they cry, "All we have are interpretations," but when they want to make their points (say, about hell as a metaphor, inclusivism, and kingdom living) they argue, "You've been misreading the Bible, can't you see?" It seems there is a meaning in the text after all." (p. 84)
"Christianity cannot and does not exist without boundaries. Being a Christian in any biblical sense requires that we not only say yes to many things, but that we also are willing to say no to a number of beliefs and behaviors." (p. 118)
"Young people will give their lives for an exclamation point, but they will not give their lives for a question mark, not for very long anyway." (p. 127)
"At what point can we say that "sitting barefooted on the floor" and commenting on Ephesians as an impromptu but extended tete-a-tete between church members and leadership" that focuses on "the intensity of interpersonal communication" sounds more profound than it really is? There's nothing offensive about this tete-a-tete, but isn't it just sitting on the ground talking about the Bible?" (p. 155)
"Pastors are supposed to be more than lost travelers with more questions than answers. They are supposed to fan into flames the gift of preaching (2 Tim. 1:6), be filled with power instead of timidity (1:7), and rebuke, reprove, and exhort with complete patience and teaching (4:2)." (p. 160)
"Orthodoxy means right doctrine that overflows in right living, which can be variously applied in the political sphere. For emerging churches, however, it seems that orthodoxy means right living immediately applied in the political sphere without attention to doctrine." (p. 192)
"I'm sure emergent Christians are sincere in their love for Jesus, but what kind of love is it that makes so little of His glory as the long-awaited Messiah and the Son of the living God (Matt. 16:16), the Alpha and the Omega (Rev. 1:8), the righteous Judge (2 Tim. 4:8), the conquering King who rules the nations with a rod of iron (Rev. 2:26-27), the great I am (John 8:58) and the Lamb who was slain to take away the sin of the world (John 1:29)?" (p. 204)
Also check out Kevin's last chapter on the churches in Revelation. Great comparisons to churches today.
This was a great book and I highly recommend it, both for those in the emergent church to challenge their beliefs and help them see the God of the Bible, and for those is "traditional" churches, both to be aware of this movement and how to defend biblical beliefs against it as well as simply for a tremendous presentation of the glorious gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ in the Bible.
More Reviews of this book:
Tim Challies (Excellent reviewer)
Sam Storms (bottom of the page - 5 parts)
Theooze (Amy Sandova - for an emergent-sympathetic point of view on the book)









